Can we separate the blocksize ‘debate’ from a SegWit upgrade?

 

247 Bitcoin

Bitcoin & Crypto & NFT News

247 Bitcoin -1 Bitcoins -247 BTC - 1 Crypto - Kryptous

1 News - 247 News - 1 Search - 1 eBooks

 


Some of the benefits of SegWit include:

  • Malleability Fixes.
  • Linear scaling of sighash operations.
  • Signing of input values.
  • Increased security for multisig via pay-to-script-hash (P2SH).
  • Script versioning.
  • Reducing UTXO growth.
  • Efficiency gains when not verifying signatures.

Regardless of your position on block size surely there would be unanimous support for these features/fixes/improvements?

Can we change the narrative going forward to unite all bitcoiners on this as a separate technical issue, and debate a block size/hardfork on its own merits?

submitted by /u/101111
[link] [comments]

 

247 Bitcoin

Bitcoin & Crypto & NFT News

247 Bitcoin -1 Bitcoins -247 BTC - 1 Crypto - Kryptous

1 News - 247 News - 1 Search - 1 eBooks

 

Leave a Reply